Check out this post on the new version of Rink Stats.
I wrote
an article this week for Deadspin looking at how much better college basketball "experts" did at predicting the NCAA tournament this year than non-experts. I used the same 11 million brackets from ESPN.com's Tournament Challenge as I used for
the earlier article in the Wall Street Journal. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the experts didn't do all that much better than the non-experts.
"Generally the experts' brackets were slightly better than the non-expert ones, although the evidence isn't especially overwhelming. The analysis suggests that next year you'll have just as good a chance of winning your office pool if you make your own picks as if you follow the experts."
I've also made the data available here.
No comments:
Post a Comment